Skip to main content

Two thoughts

My two thoughts for the morning. As the BBC moves to replace the CofE as the national church of no belief, as parts of the BBC becomes more irrelevant in the new world is it possible The BBC will consume itself with its left wing cynical view? When the issue of faith is shown the back door and told not to come back who will the new priests and priestess pour their cynicism on? Perhaps themselves? For we all need the other voice who we don’t agree with to gain a greater understanding of who and what we are.  History tells us every regime needs someone to bully

Secondly, will The Church not be better without these platforms of privilege? When we are no longer welcome on the platform of privilege as will happen at some point, will we not need to shape up to redefine what we believe, what we have to share, what we don’t need? Privilege tends to make you slow on your feet, breed chummy inward looking relationships, privilege steals from people the ability to move under the defining culture of the day.  


Comments

  1. To me the BBC looks rather right-wing, there's objective evidence to show that it favours Conservative representatives over Labour and that even more right-wing nationalists are well represented, for example, Nigel Farage has been on QT at least 31 times, making him one of the most frequent panel members.

    The second paragraph I think, I'd agree with : a disestablished CofE would be liberated IMHO to not have to toe the Patriotic / Nationalist line and perhaps this would give it a better opportunity to present the gospel authentically.

    Consider one of the major issues with the church in the US in the Trump era. By associating so strongly with a narcissistic, nationalistic, despot and pursuing policies which punish the poor, the vulnerable, and foreigners (except for the Russian Oligarchy of course), creation (via the rejection of the Paris Agreement and the subversion of the EPA) while lining the pockets of the rich and powerful with tax cuts and overt cronyism and nepotism; Trump's Christians play into the worst of accusations of utterly unchristian hypocrisy.

    The same pious Evangelicals who voted for G W Bush and cheered as he launched a war on Iraq that destroyed over 66% of the church in that country while scattering most of the rest are shamelessly back for a turbo-charged "Only America First" round 2 catastrophe. How God's heart bleeds and it's not surprising that the US church is losing members at an accelerating rate :-(

    Well, I seem to have gone off on one here, but the upshot I think is that we'd be better off with less of that kind of relationship with the state.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sorry Nigel, can't agree with you here! All but the last two sentences of your first paragraph are just polemical. Makes you feel better but that's all! I'd go with Snial in his/her view of the BBC. Withdrawal of privilege can be painful, but that is what the CoE/churches are experiencing and I see that as healthy.

    The individuals who have stood out to me are the people who have been invited in because of themselves and their message rather than just a label to fill a God slot (that probably shouldn't be a capital letter there.)

    You are absolutely right in your second paragraph in my view. There is an interesting article in this month's "Theology" magazine about "blessing" - a wedding, a nuclear submarine - what are we actually doing or saying. It's about trying to disengage from old mindsets and hearing afresh.

    And are you still coming up
    to see us?

    best wishes to you both.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The End is nigh

If you watch old black and white TV programs it is possible to see usually a man wearing a sandwich board stating  ‘The end is nigh’ . We look back and perhaps see how misguided they were, wrong time? Wrong place?  They were people who were passionate and prepared to stand out of the crowd for their cause. Those people who tried to guide us in a different direction are now images of ridicule and sly or open laughter. So where are they today? My feeling is these sandwich board bearers of the past are now the politicians of our government yes the once ridiculed people of the 50s have become politicians of today. Don’t be daft I hear you say they are not as ill thought out as those narrow minded misguided people of the past. Well I believe so and I see them imbedded in the in out EU argument. I feel I am being guided by the conversation of fear.  Woe to us if we stay in woe woe to us if we leave. This form of argument is straight out of the 1950s our politicians today are black and white

Response To Bishop North

A while back Bishop Phillip North spoke to New Wine and caused a bit of a reaction one of it was a Tweet to my millions of followers. In response I had a phone call from The Church Times asking for a quote because I serve in a poor parish, I declined and said I would put a more considered response on my blog, so here it is with a link to The Bishops full talk. https://www.churchtimes.co.uk/articles/2017/4-august/news/uk/there-s-a-future-for-the-church-if-evangelicals-put-the-poor-first-bishop-north-tells-new-wine 1.      One of the issues the church does not recognise is the exportation of people , talents and money from parishes like mine to middle class parishes which is draining and demanding on leadership. For 10 years I thought I was building a community, then it dawned on me I was building people up to go to other places. 2.      Bishop Phillip talks of abandonment of the poor: I think it’s more complicated than that. When I came back to my Deanery in 2000 to my

me

I was and still am very unsure whether to post this blog. I still may regret it. I have always understood myself as strong male working-class urban solder normally ready for the conflict of the day. I used to say to my congregation occasionally if you knew me when I was 21 you would not like me. In my youth I was one half of the union rep who would go and bang on the managers desk for what seemed at the time important and usually unjust reasons. I once remember going to my manager and he giving bad news, my response was to say ‘that’s not fair!’ His response - ‘Who told you life was fair?’ I say this as a short introduction to my character. I am not like John the Beloved, quiet and reflective (but that is changing).   I am more like Peter; impetuous, verbal, quick to promise, quick to react, but passionate for the cause. But there is a cost to being passionate and outspoken. The flip side for me is darkness and depression. Rejection of something you believe in your very cor